QTL Map Information |
Chromosome: | 20 |
QTL Peak Location: | n/a |
QTL Span: | n/a
|
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
Upper, "Significant": | rs134455910 |
Peak: | |
Lower, "Significant": | rs42291477 |
Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
Marker type: | CNV |
Analysis type: | QTL |
Model tested: | n/a |
Test base: | Experiment-wise |
Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
P_values | 2.411E-5 | Dominance effect: | n/a |
Additive effect: | n/a |
Associated Gene: | n/a |
Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
Links:
Edit |
Map view
|
Extended information: |
(none) |
User inputs on QTL #239936
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
QTL Experiment in Brief |
Animals: | Animals were Holstein-Friesian, Charolais, and Limousin cattle. |
Breeds associated:
|
Design: | Animals were genotyped using the Illumina BovineHD BeadChip, and CNV data was used to perform GWAS for carcass traits. A total of 712,555 SNPs were used for analysis. |
Analysis: | The present study consisted of four separate sets of association
analyses of carcass weight, carcass fat, and carcass conformation; two were based on aggregate metrics per chromosome with the remaining two being undertaken for individual CNV or SNP. The four separate analyses differed by the independent variable in the
model which were: (1) the mean LRR per autosomal chromosome, (2) the proportion of each chromosome that had a called CNV, (3) the CNV copy number, and (4) the SNP LRR value. |
Software: | PennCNV, QuantiSNP, FImpute |
Notes: | |
Links: | Edit |
Reference |
Authors: | Rafter P, Gormley IC, Purfield D, Parnell AC, Naderi S, Berry DP |
Affiliation: | Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Cork, Fermoy, Ireland |
Title: | Genome-wide association analyses of carcass traits using copy number variants and raw intensity values of single nucleotide polymorphisms in cattle |
Journal: | BMC Genomics, 2021, 22(1): 757 |
Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |

User inputs on reference #34688258
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|