| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 6 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 120.5 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 99.46-99.53 (cM)
72.5-72.5 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | - |
| Analysis type: | QTL |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | Chromosome-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
LikelihoodR | 20.16 | | P_values | <0.01 | | Dominance effect: | -1.11 |
| Additive effect: | 1.55 |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #7540
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Animals were from an Iberian x Landrace and an Iberian x Meishan cross. |
| Breeds associated:
|
| Design: | Animals were genotyped for 8 microsatellite markers and 2 SNPs (IB x MS) or 15 microsatellites, 1 SNP, and an insertion (IB x LR). They were analyzed at 3 time points for body weight and backfat thickness. |
| Analysis: | Single and pleoitropic QTL analyses were carried out. In addition, a joint QTL analysis was run on both populations. |
| Software: | CRIMAP, QXPAK |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Munoz, G; Ovilo, C; Silio, L; Tomas, A; Noguera, J L; Rodriguez, M C |
| Affiliation: | Departamento de Mejora Genetica Animal, Subdireccion General de Investigacion y Tecnologia-Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Technologia Agraria y Alimentaira, 28040 Madrid, Spain; munoz.gloria@inia.es |
| Title: | Single- and joint-population analyses of two experimental pig crosses to confirm quantitative trait loci on Sus scrofa chromosome 6 and leptin receptor effects on fatness and growth traits. |
| Journal: | J Anim Sci, 2009, 87 (2): 459-68 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
| Additional Information |
|---|
| Comments: | ultrasound |
User inputs on reference #18952727
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
