| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 13 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 53 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 31.60-32.55 (cM)
18.7-19.3 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | |
| Analysis type: | QTL |
| Model tested: | n/a |
| Test base: | n/a |
| Threshold significance level: | n/a |
 |
F_Stat | 7.6 | | VARIANCE | 7.5 | | Dominance effect: | 6.0 |
| Additive effect: | -13.5 |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #3095
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | A three-generation pedigree by crossing two European wild boars with eight Large White sows. Four males and 22 females were inter-crossed to generate 200 offspring. |
| Breeds associated:
n/a
|
| Design: | QTL analysis was performed using a three-generation F2 population from inter-crossing of European wild boar and Large White sows. |
| Analysis: | Marker data were used to calculate the probabilities of each individual inheriting none, one, or two alleles from each breed for an unobserved QTL at a given position in the genome. All markers in the linkage group were used to calculate the genotypic pro |
| Software: | CORR procedure of SAS |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Andersson L, Haley CS, Ellegren H, Knott SA, Johansson M, Andersson K, Andersson-Eklund L, Edfors- Lilja I, Fredholm M, Hansson |
| Affiliation: | Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala |
| Title: | Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs |
| Journal: | Science (New York, N.Y.), 1994, 25;263(5154):1771-4 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
| Additional Information |
|---|
| Comments: | birth-30 kg |
User inputs on reference #8134840
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
