| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 6 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 135 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 121.1-149.8 (cM)
94.4-146.4 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | SW1881 |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | SW322 |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | Microsatellites |
| Analysis type: | QTL |
| Model tested: | n/a |
| Test base: | n/a |
| Threshold significance level: | n/a |
 |
F_Stat | 9.35 | | VARIANCE | 5.3 | | Dominance effect: | -0.56 |
| Additive effect: | 0.22 |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #2859
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | The experiment wa based on a 3-generation full-sib design. The resource family was created using 7 unrelated Pietrain grandsires and 16 unrelated granddams of a crossbred line(Large White x Landrace x Leicoma). 315 pigs of the F2 generation were used |
| Breeds associated:
n/a
|
| Design: | Lean-meat percentage and separate weights of valuable carcass cuts were measured using the AutoFOM device. Besides these, standard perfomance traits were measured. |
| Analysis: | Regression analysis of the F2 population was computed with QTL Express using the line-cross least-squares multi-marker regression interval mapping program. |
| Software: | QTL Express |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | M. Mohrmann, R. Roehe, P. W. Knap, H. Looft, G. S. Plastow, E. Kalm |
| Affiliation: | Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Scottish Agriculture College, Edinburgh, UK; PIC Germany, Schleswig, Germany |
| Title: | Quantitative trait loci associated with AutoFOM grading characteristics, carcass cuts and chemical body composition during growth of Sus scrofa |
| Journal: | Animal Genetics, 2006, 37: 435-443 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
User inputs on reference #16978171
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
