QTL Map Information |
Chromosome: | 1 |
QTL Peak Location: | 81 (cM) |
QTL Span: | 80.5-81.6 (cM) 168.7-210.6 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
Upper, "Significant": | S0113 |
Peak: | SW1431 |
Lower, "Significant": | SPIPSU |
Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
Marker type: | Microsatellites |
Analysis type: | QTL |
Model tested: | n/a |
Test base: | n/a |
Threshold significance level: | n/a |
 |
F_Stat | 8.4 | VARIANCE | 0.16 | Dominance effect: | 0.08 |
Additive effect: | 0.16 |
Associated Gene: | n/a |
Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
Extended information: |
(none) |
User inputs on QTL #1271
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
QTL Experiment in Brief |
Animals: | 462 animals from a combined intercross and backcross between Hampshire and Landrace pigs. |
Breeds associated:
n/a
|
Design: | Several precisely defined muscle phenotypes were measured in order to dissect body composition in more detail. Three significant QTL were detected in the study at the 1% genome-wide level, and twelve significant QTL were detected at the 5% genome-wid |
Analysis: | Data were analysed using multiple linear regression fitting additive and dominance effects. This model was compared with a model including a parent-of-origin effect to spot evidence of imprinting. |
Software: | |
Notes: | |
Links: | Edit |
Reference |
Authors: | P. Karlskov-Mortensen,C. S. Bruun, M. H. Braunschweig, M. Sawera, E. Markljung, A. C. Enfalt, I. Hedebro-Velander, A . Josell, G |
Affiliation: | The Royal Veterinary and Agriculture University, Frederiksberg, Denmark; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden; University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland; Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Quality Genetics, Ka |
Title: | Genome-wide identification of quantitative trait loci in a cross between Hampshire and Landrace I: carcass traits |
Journal: | Animal Genetics, 2005, Volume 10 Issue 1111 |
Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |

User inputs on reference #16573530
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|