| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 2 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 69 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 62-119 (cM)
19.3-37.0 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | ADL0190 |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | MCW0063 |
| Marker type: | Microsatellites |
| Analysis type: | QTL |
| Model tested: | n/a |
| Test base: | Genome-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | n/a |
 |
P_values | <0.2 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #1877
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | The base population was formed by crossing seven partially inbred lines of White Plymouth Rock chickens. A total of 874 F2 offspring comprising 75 full-sib families were used for QTL analysis. |
| Breeds associated:
n/a
|
| Design: | The phenotypic measures included body weight at 56 days of age an weight of abdominal fa, breast muscle, lung, shank, bursa, and spleen at 70 days of age. Plasma concentrations of glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, insulin, glucagon, and IGF-1 were |
| Analysis: | ANOVA was performed using Minitab to identify factores affecting phenotypic variation. Significant effects of family and sex wree observed, and these were therefore included in the model for QTL analysis. |
| Software: | |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Park HB, Jacobsson L, Wahlberg P, Siegel PB, Andersson L. |
| Affiliation: | Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University,Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden. |
| Title: | QTL analysis of body composition and metabolic traits in an intercross betweenchicken lines divergently selected for growth. |
| Journal: | Physiol Genomics, 2006, 25(2):216-23 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
User inputs on reference #16390876
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
