| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 1 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 226 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 0.00-100.00 (cM)
|
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | |
| Analysis type: | QTL |
| Model tested: | n/a |
| Test base: | Genome-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | n/a |
 |
F_Stat | 6.5 | | P_values | <0.2 | | Dominance effect: | 32.1 |
| Additive effect: | -25.4 |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #1810
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Twenty red junglefowl and 31 White Leghorns were used in the study. |
| Breeds associated:
n/a
|
| Design: | Body weight was taken at 1, 8, 46, 112, and 200 d of age. Total egg weight, metabolic body weight, plumage condition, and number of eggs produced was recorded. All birds were exposed to a series of behavioral tests. |
| Analysis: | All animals were genotyped for 105 genetic markers evenly distributed in the genome. QTL analysis was performed on the 25 autosomal linkage groups covered usig the line cross least squares based method. |
| Software: | CriMap and Minitab |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Schutz KE, Kerje S, Jacobsson L, Forkman B, Carlborg O, Andersson L, Jensen P. |
| Affiliation: | Department of Animal Environment and Health, Section of Ethology, SwedishUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. |
| Title: | Major growth QTLs in fowl are related to fearful behavior: possible geneticlinks between fear responses and production traits in a red junglefowl x whiteleghorn intercross. |
| Journal: | Behav Genet, 2004, 34(1):121-30 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
| Additional Information |
|---|
| Comments: | Time spent lying while restrained |
User inputs on reference #14739702
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
