| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | X |
| QTL Peak Location: | 112.13 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 111.65-112.61 (cM)
110.7-110.7 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | rs109289869 |
| Peak: | rs134244037 |
| Lower, "Significant": | rs133784615 |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | SNP |
| Analysis type: | QTL |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | Experiment-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
VARIANCE | 1.95 | | P_values | 0.0166 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #56472
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Animals were from four different beef cattle populations: Cycle VII (Angus, Hereford, Simmental, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Red Angus, Charolais, Pinzgauer, Red Poll), Angus, Hereford, and Simmental x Angus. |
| Breeds associated:
|
| Design: | Depending on population, animals were genotyped using either the BovineSNP50 or BovineHD BeadChip and analyzed for growth, feed intake, and feed efficiency traits. |
| Analysis: | A BayesB method was used. |
| Software: | GenSel, JMP |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Saatchi M, Beever JE, Decker JE, Faulkner DB, Freetly HC, Hansen SL, Yampara-Iquise H, Johnson KA, Kachman SD, Kerley MS, Kim J, Loy DD, Marques E, Neibergs HL, Pollak EJ, Schnabel RD, Seabury CM, Shike DW, Snelling WM, Spangler ML, Weaber RL, Garrick DJ, Taylor JF |
| Affiliation: | Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA |
| Title: | QTLs associated with dry matter intake, metabolic mid-test weight, growth and feed efficiency have little overlap across 4 beef cattle studies |
| Journal: | BMC genomics, 2014, 15: 1004 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
User inputs on reference #25410110
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
